Comments on: Gift Packaging Helps Retailers and Gift Packagers Go Green http://greenmachines.us/conservation/gift-packaging-company-helps-retailers-and-gift-packagers-go-green Our Journey To A Greener World Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:22:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Ade Paul http://greenmachines.us/conservation/gift-packaging-company-helps-retailers-and-gift-packagers-go-green/comment-page-1#comment-668 Ade Paul Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:00:57 +0000 http://greenmachines.us/?p=55#comment-668 Recycled packaging is simply common sense, it may cost just a little more initially, but the end justifies the means where only the environment can win, as pollution and waste are reduced. The Weather's Wrath, it's a great title and written by Ade Paul ISBN 9780473131500. It has a great notes section discussing the skeptics debate, this has merits, but each can be debated against, in saying this, accurate records of climate have only been taken in the past decade to give true readings compared to historical estimates or data. Any scientist will accept this data is so recent no trends can be theorised or statistical data assessed to compare to earlier longitudinal or cross-sectional studies, but even it is or isn't warming, we as homo sapiens should NOT BE SO ARROGANT, SELFISH AND NAIVE to demand we keep our high luxury standard of living without making an effort to limit our pollution, and that goes for almost every citizen in first world countries, even lower socio-economic classes here live well, TV, washing machine, fridge/freezer, car etc, all things we take for granted and expect, but these need power and it ALL COSTS, but what is the intangible costs to the environment? Surely you are not that arrogant to believe you are not affecting the environment, killing species you didn't even know were there. So think next time outside the box, and not in your safe little box to maintain Maslov's critieria for survival. www.whakabooks.com Recycled packaging is simply common sense, it may cost just a little more initially, but the end justifies the means where only the environment can win, as pollution and waste are reduced. The Weather’s Wrath, it’s a great title and written by Ade Paul ISBN 9780473131500. It has a great notes section discussing the skeptics debate, this has merits, but each can be debated against, in saying this, accurate records of climate have only been taken in the past decade to give true readings compared to historical estimates or data. Any scientist will accept this data is so recent no trends can be theorised or statistical data assessed to compare to earlier longitudinal or cross-sectional studies, but even it is or isn’t warming, we as homo sapiens should NOT BE SO ARROGANT, SELFISH AND NAIVE to demand we keep our high luxury standard of living without making an effort to limit our pollution, and that goes for almost every citizen in first world countries, even lower socio-economic classes here live well, TV, washing machine, fridge/freezer, car etc, all things we take for granted and expect, but these need power and it ALL COSTS, but what is the intangible costs to the environment? Surely you are not that arrogant to believe you are not affecting the environment, killing species you didn’t even know were there.

So think next time outside the box, and not in your safe little box to maintain Maslov’s critieria for survival.

http://www.whakabooks.com

]]>